|
www.OntarioBlackBears.com |
 |
|
|
Ontario's Problems With Black Bears
~As Complicated As Nature Itself~ |
|
|
Petition
to Stop Bans on Hunting
The editorial below points out how much
some media has bought into the misinformation about Ontario Black
Bears diseminated by radical elements of the animal rights movement,
and how much value some media put into being politically correct,
rather than ethical. The lack of research, and clear bias of
this article is apalling in a newspaper of the Toronto Star's
stature. The quality of this article begs the question: Is the
Toronto Star a Newspaper or a Gossip Rag which is a waste of
the trees it took to print it? The NOTO
reply below corrects the misinformation but has not been
printed by the Toronto Star.
Toronto
Star
www.theStar.com
Editorial: Say no to bear hunt
Dec. 9, 2005. 01:00 AM
Citing the rising number of bears and humans,
several major pro-hunting organizations, such as the Ontario
Federation of Anglers and Hunters and the Northern Ontario Tourist
Outfitters Association, are urging the provincial government
to reinstate the spring bear hunt.
And MPPs representing Northern Ontario ridings have called on
the government to take additional measure to protect residents
from bears.
The mauling death of Cambridge physician Dr. Jacqueline Perry
in September at a provincial park near Cochrane has added a sense
of urgency to those impassioned calls.
But allowing a spring bear hunt, which was cancelled in 1999
by the former Conservative government, is a move Premier Dalton
McGuinty should refuse on several grounds.
First, there already is an autumn hunt in which several thousand
bears are killed annually. In addition, hunting bears in the
spring often leaves cubs orphaned and helpless.
Too often, bears are hunted more for trophy sport than for food.
The same does not hold true with hunters of other animals, such
as moose, ducks and deer.
Also, the spring hunt will benefit only a few wilderness outfitters
and hunting camp operators.
Public opinion surveys indicate most Ontario residents did not
support a spring bear hunt when it was cancelled six years ago.
It is unlikely that they have changed their minds dramatically.
Hunters may be right when they say that contact between humans
and bears is becoming more common. A provincial hotline has received
18 per cent more calls this year than in 2004.
And clearly some businesses do rely on hunting for much-needed
income in a region lacking economic opportunity.
However, neither argument carries sufficient weight to consider
restoration of the spring bear hunt.
The province is taking steps to reduce contact between bears
and humans. One such effort is the 2-year-old Bear Wise program,
which has funded 98 community projects and provided teaching
materials for schools to ensure people and bears can more peacefully
co-exist.
Killing more bears to prevent their encroachment into human territory,
though, smacks of the kind of attitude that continues to decimate
species across the globe.
Stand firm, Mr. Premier.
Comment on the Toronto Star's Editorial on
NOTO's Bulletin Board
Below is NOTO's reply to the Toronto Star Editorial. Although
the Toronto Star mentioned NOTO directly in their editorial,
the Toronto Star has not yet printed NOTO's reply to their editorial.
Generally it is considered only fair, that organizations and
individuals mentioned in an article be allowed to present their
side of the story.
The Toronto Star
One Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario M5E 1E6
December 14, 2005
Dear sir:
In your editorial of Dec. 9, you suggest
that the premier should resist the pressure from MPPs in northern
Ontario to reinstate a spring bear hunt. Unfortunately, every
one of the arguments you give for not reinstating the hunt is
based on incorrect "facts".
You suggest that a spring hunt orphans
cubs. Figures from the Ministry of Natural Resources demonstrate
that this is clearly not the case. Although it was illegal to
shoot sows with cubs, MNR records for the five years preceding
the cancellation do not show a single charge being laid, or even
warning given for illegally shooting a sow with cubs. Estimates
by ministry biologists suggested that orphaning of cubs due to
hunting was so low as to be insignificant.
Orphaning of cubs has increased dramatically
since the cancellation of the spring hunt. Some are orphaned
when their mothers are killed as nuisance bears, but most orphaning
probably occurs when the sow is killed defending her cubs from
a cannibalistic male bear. Bears are highly territorial, so increasing
population density increased this behaviour.
Your editorial also suggests that bears
are hunted mainly as trophies, and that the meat is wasted. Again,
this is absolutely untrue. It is illegal to waste game meat,
including bear, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this
meat is commonly wasted. Contrary to the popular myth, black
bear meat is absolutely delicious and very easy to prepare. Why
would any hunter throw it away? On the other hand, the nuisance
bears being killed by local offi cials are being wasted. They
are generally disposed of at local dumps, and provide neither
food nor economic benefi t to anyone.
You also suggest that the spring hunt brought
very little economic benefi t. Most estimates suggest that it
was about a $40 million annual activity. In communities struggling
with declines in traditional industries like forestry, this is
a signifi cant fi gure. Furthermore, the hunt extended the tourism
season by six weeks or more and provided an important infusion
of income at the very start of the season. Very few tourism operators
have found other activities to attract guests during this time,
and therefore stay closed. The losses don't stop there. Guests
who came to Ontario to hunt in the spring often returned for
fi shing or other vacation activities later in the season. Those
people now go to Quebec or Manitoba.
A spring hunt for black bears makes sense
for the same reasons that hunting other animals in the fall makes
sense. Bears are different than moose or deer. They give birth
at a different time of year, and their main food needs occur
at a different time.
The issue of the spring hunt should not
be decided because of nuisance bears. Black bears are a magnifi
cent animal and a valuable renewable resource. The fact that
the discussion has shifted to nuisance animals and dangerous
encounters is sad evidence that black bears are rapidly losing
their status as a highly prized big game animal and being regarded
as valueless vermin.
Any black bear management strategy should
be evaluated on the basis of sustainability of the resource,
socio-economic benefi t and humane hunting practices. A well
regulated spring hunt clearly meets the test on all of these
counts. The cancellation was a mistake, based on misinformation.
The time has come for the premier to do the right thing and correct
that mistake.
Sincerely,
Doug Reynolds
Executive Director
Comment on Doug Reynold's Reply to the Toronto Star's
Editorial on
NOTO's Bulletin Board
PDF of
the NOTO Reply to Toronto Star Editorial
|
www.OntarioBlackBears.com |
 |
|
|
Ontario's Problems With Black Bears
~As Complicated As Nature Itself~ |
|
|

Travel & Adventure in Canada - Reisen & Abenteuer in
Kanada
|
Advertising
|